Anita might be a good film. The only thing is: the SUBTITLES! SUCKED!! They came on five-ten seconds after the dialogue or scene had ended; sometimes flashed so briefly that there was no way to read them; and very often there were large gaps where single words would just show up occasionally. Because the story was fairly complex (a murder/suicide/reincarnation/multiple personality/ghost story) I had a headache in no time.
And I became distracted by mostly irrelevant details (as you will see). Luckily there were plenty of irrelevant details to entertain, but still. As I said—I think properly understood, this might be a good film. I wish I knew for sure. The music is certainly delightful!
Directed by Raj Khosla in his inimitable style (lots of mirrors and windows), it is the story of a girl named Anita (Sadhana) and Neeraj who loves her (Manoj Kumar). As the story opens, Anita is lying on a plush carpet surrounded by film magazines. Outside, Neeraj serenades her with a pretty song—”Gore Gore.”
Anita’s wealthy father (Sajjan) doesn’t approve of Neeraj, however, and has gotten her engaged to Anil Sharma (I’m not clear on who the actor is, if anyone can clear it up for me I’ll be grateful). Anita almost marries Neeraj in a registry office but her father stops her; and when Neeraj goes to her home afterwards she refuses to speak to him.
He leaves town in distress, but receives a letter from her a few days later saying that she and her “respect” are in danger. He returns to Bombay immediately, only to be told that she is dead (at least that’s what I surmise from what followed…the subtitles never did show up).
One of these days I’m going to do a post on the most common subtitle errors, like quite=quiet. See? Distracted.
Anyway, Anil and Anita’s father tell him that she committed suicide when she discovered that she was pregnant. Neeraj is aghast—this is not the Anita he knew and loved. Anil tells Neeraj that Anita was strange sometimes; once for a masquerade party, she dressed up as a tribal girl and was found dancing shamelessly with a group of gypsies (another nice song “Picchware Buddha Khansta”).
Confronted by her father and Anil, she fainted and was taken to a doctor. The diagnosis: split personality.
Personality switches are brought on by a change of clothing??! I must ask my shrink friends about this. Or my friend Ed, who actually does have multiple personality disorder.
Ah yes, the increasingly-hard-to-follow story. Anil sends Neeraj to see a painter friend of his, who also witnessed this kind of bizarre behavior in Anita and *gasp* had an actual affair with her as evidenced by this portrait:
The painter (IS Johar) confirms what Anil has said, and tells his story. He met Anita in a bar, where she was drunk and sang a song.
I am thrilled—thrilled!!!!—to recognize her backup band! I’ve seen them in three films now (this along with Janwar and Gumnaam): it’s Ted Lyons & His Cubs!
This third sighting is heretofore undocumented on the Internet, I think, at least I have been unable to discover much about them. I rewind over and over to watch the 30 seconds they are on screen with three white guys gyrating in front of them. Hilarious!
Bewildered by this information, and unwilling to let go of Anita yet, Neeraj decides to hire a private detective (Dhumal) to look into her suicide. You have to love the office notice board:
And if not that, then this:
Neeraj hires him. Then a few days later as he is walking through an old fort on the beach, he sees—Anita! Several long minutes of screeching violins and pounding snare drums accompany this, adding to the subtitle-induced headache.
Shocked, he follows her to a creepy old mansion, where she disappears. He starts “seeing” her everywhere now, but it always turns out to be someone else when he gets close enough to speak.
I am now pleasantly distracted by a comic side plot in which Dhumal is hired by Tun Tun to find her missing husband. When he asks her for her measurements she hilariously replies “51-62-77″ and they all crack up.
So do I.
When Neeraj tells the detectives and the police that he has seen Anita, they put it down to grief and wishful thinking, and send him off for some R and R to Nainital where his brother lives. The scenery is beautiful, including a paisley-shaped lake (and a delayed subtitle from another scene).
One day Neeraj is picnicking with his brother and his bhabhi, and goes off to get some water. You guessed it!—he sees Anita, now dressed as a devotee (subtitles say “mendicant”). She is singing and doesn’t seem happy.
When he approaches her, she tells him that her name is “Maya Mendicant.” Really! She doesn’t know him, but agrees to meet him the next day in the same place. She does so, but is so distressed by his obvious pain that she doesn’t come back again. This prompts him to sing the lovely “Tum Bin Jeevan.”
He parks himself under a banyan tree, where his brother and bhabhi find him (he’s been missing for two days). He tells them about Maya and they ask to meet her. Up at the temple, a priest says that there’s no devotee there, but when Neeraj says her name, he takes them to a burned-out house with a plaque on it (not subtitled, but if someone wants to translate it for me I’d be grateful).
I eventually figure out that Maya died twenty years earlier. Or maybe thirty, depending on who you ask.
Neeraj decides to go home. But who does he see on the train? A woman wearing a burkha and Anita’s gold anklets! He rips off her head covering.
She says she will tell him everything but as he sits down, the train goes into a tunnel. When it comes back out into the light, she has disappeared again (we see her hiding in the toilet). Back at home, Detective Dhumal is exasperated by Neeraj’s tale.
He and his assistant show Neeraj the post-mortem report. It clearly states that her body had been in the water for ten days before it was found, meaning she committed suicide on March 28th. But Neeraj remembers that he received a letter from her dated April 2nd. They go to the police, who verify the letter with a handwriting expert.
I love the board behind the superintendent. Theft, robbery, kidnapping and murder appear to be the only things they worry about…oh yes, the four points.
They all agree that it is now a murder case, and Anita is involved somehow. The superintendent sends two cops (named Peter and Jeff. Really!) to stake out Neeraj’s house, since they are convinced she will try to contact him again.
What is going on? Is Anita in trouble? Can Neeraj and Peter and Jeff save her? Have Ted Lyons & His Cubs been in any other films? Can whoever is responsible for subtitling this film be fired?
Here are some other minor points I enjoyed.
Imdb claims that Helen is in this film, but she isn’t. It’s Madhumati, who is often confused for Helen (with Bela Bose on the right).
I want to be a Hindi film set designer! Look at this front entrance!
Did I mention Ted Lyons and His Cubs? :-D
Enjoy.
Tags: Bollywood mystery, Dhumal, Laxmikant Pyarelal, Madhumati, Manoj Kumar, Raj Khosla, Sadhana, Ted Lyons & His Cubs, Tun Tun























May 11, 2008 at 2:43 pm |
I dont normally love sadhna or manoj, but i adore 60s’ bollywood mysteries- which is why i saw gumnaam (love it) and I am sure anita would be absolutely fabulous as well :) Im going to try tracking this down for sure- thanks!
May 11, 2008 at 3:15 pm |
Seems so fun! But the subtitles, grrrrr!
May 11, 2008 at 3:18 pm |
Yes…I don’t know if the plot holes were due to the subtitles or the script :-) But I think next time I’ll just turn the subs off (since now I basically know what happens) and just let it roll!
It did make me laugh out loud a couple of times. I am not a fan of Manoj, but he was okay in this. Sadhana too, she looks stunning.
May 11, 2008 at 3:24 pm |
Hey, after Roti Kapada aur Makaan, I’m ready for more Manoj – as long as he’s not being a hater.
LOVE the office board. It’s like a piece of art!
May 11, 2008 at 3:28 pm |
Poor Manoj is just confused and heart-broken in this one.
Oh…there were so many priceless details, I could not fit them all in. Although I tried.
May 11, 2008 at 7:05 pm |
This looks like another winner. Random Tun Tun sightings will brighten up even the dullest picture. And this Ted Lyons and His Cubs thread has me intrigued.
Bad subtitles are one of my biggest pet peeves. I know enough Hindi now to know when the subtitles are really off. They’ll simplify huge chunks of dialogue, leave out information, confuse names, or attempt to anglacize dialogue by putting in English/American references for Indian ones. Why would I be watching a Hindi film if I wanted American film references?
May 11, 2008 at 7:49 pm |
Tun Tun was hilarious—the “measurements” scene had me on the floor. She and Dhumal and the other guy could not stop laughing either as she sputtered out “51-62-77″…and she gave her height as 6 feet half an inch. Her “missing” husband turned out to be less than 5 feet tall.
And I feel like I’ve discovered another planet which nobody has seen before with the Ted Lyons thing. I so want to know who they were, what they did, what became of them…but I can find nothing.
And yes this film had EVERY single subtitle fault you can possibly be flogged by. It did have some side-splitting ones too though.
May 12, 2008 at 12:46 am |
This one sounds a lot like Woh Kaun Thi where the movie-makers convince you about spirits and ghosts and come up with a ludricrously formulaic explanation – talk about digging a mountain only to come up with a dead mouse!
I know what you mean about subtitles. I dont need them, but have them on when watching with friends. The subtitles usually turn a tragedy into a comedy through their inappropriate translations/interpretations! Plus, very often I have to supplement the subtitles with my own translations because they miss significant dialogues. Its a shame that DVD manufacturers and movie-makers cant hire competent staff to write the subtitles. The only solution seems to be for you to watch the movie with Hindi-speaking friends!
May 12, 2008 at 9:49 am |
I haven’t seen “Woh Kaun Thi” yet (I know! a serious gap!) but it also reminded me of “Yeh Raat Phir Na Aayegi” which also dug a mountain only to come up with a dead mouse :-D
Another solution would be to learn to speak Hindi myself…but I’m making less progress on that than I would like. You’d think it would be easy for DVD manufacturers to find good subtitlers—an awful lot of Indians speak really good English.
May 12, 2008 at 10:33 am |
Just a bit of trivia (that you perhaps already knew) -
Woh Kaun Thi (1964) and Mera Saaya (1966), along with Anita are considered a Raj Khosla-Sadhna trilogy-of-sorts. All of them have the mystery/multiple persona/double role/ghost theme.
In addition, all three movies share a lyricist – the wonderful Raja Mehdi Ali Khan, who passed away towards the end of the making of Anita, if I remember correctly. Also, two of the three movies have music by Madan Mohan, whose pairing with RMAK gave us a bunch of Lata classics.
Oh and memsaab – is there a store in the city that has a good Hindi movie collection or do you rent/buy online?
May 12, 2008 at 10:43 am |
Excellent info, Megha, thanks! I have seen “Mera Saaya” (with Sunil Dutt) but it didn’t make much of an impression—I need to watch it again, I think. Writing this blog is really helping me retain more from the films I write about, gotta admit!
There are a couple of Indian grocery stores nearby that have Hindi DVDs, but they always ask brand new prices for used DVDs :-) So I buy online (Nehaflix is great) and rent (Netflix)…
May 12, 2008 at 11:51 am |
Memsaab,
sounds fun..Here’s the plaque translation you wanted:
Transliterated, the plaque says:
Jogan Maya
ka
Smriti Smarak
Janam: 1 March 1920, Maha Nirvaan: 5 January 1941.
Jogan Maya’s memorial. Birth: 1 March 1920, Death: 5 January 1941.
- M
May 12, 2008 at 11:56 am |
M—you rule over everything. THANK YOU! :-)
May 20, 2008 at 2:37 pm |
Didn’t Ted Lyons & His Cubs also appeared in Qurbani?
May 20, 2008 at 2:52 pm |
Didi, not in the version I have :-) But if you can find evidence (screen shots are good!) of them anywhere I will be v.v. happy.
May 21, 2008 at 2:08 am |
Memsaab,
I don’t see this movie mentioned in your blog, so I thought I’d recommend it. It’s called “Pushpak”, and it’s a silent movie starring Kamalhassan. It’s funny, touching, and enormously inventive (in how it manages to do away with dialogue without really seeming to).
Oh, and I picked this one especially because it doesn’t have crazy subtitles for you to laugh at :)
~r
May 21, 2008 at 8:47 am |
Thanks Ramsu, I think I have heard of Pushpak and I’ll look for it.
Re: subtitles: I hope I don’t offend when I make fun of subtitles. Believe me, I know I could not do better if I were transcribing from Hindi to English! Honestly, sometimes they are so much fun though—but I mean that only in a good way, and don’t mean to be condescending at all. And I only get frustrated because I need them and wish I didn’t, and when they are bad it can really ruin an otherwise nice movie-watching experience.
May 21, 2008 at 11:22 am |
Memsaab,
I don’t think you offend anyone reading your blog when you comment on the subtitles. The ones who write those subtitles, maybe. I’ve always wondered what that job was like. Do those guys look back on their work and say, “The high point of my career was Are you man or egg?” :-)
I agree with you on the extent to which subtitles affect our movie-watching experience. Sometimes, the translations are so literal, they get in the way of the meaning. It’s difficult to capture the spirit of a language sometimes.
Given how much you genuinely enjoy movies that most others would be condescending about, I’d say you don’t have to worry about being condescending.
~r
September 20, 2008 at 9:01 pm |
Memsaab, which release of ANITA did you watch? I am watching the SHEMAROO dvd and the subtitles are right on time…no nasty delay. I know that Music India also released this movie on DVD and I wonder if that is the one you watched. If so go and get the Shemaroo version…the subtitles are still crazy translations, but at least they show up when they are supposed to.
PS: I love, love, love Tun Tun in this movie!
September 21, 2008 at 9:59 am |
I think mine is Shemaroo, maybe it’s a different master or something though…
Tun Tun is great everywhere she goes :-)
September 22, 2008 at 1:34 am |
OH, and Anil Sharma is played by Keshan Meta (aka Krishen Mehta). He plays Asha Parekh’s murderous hubby in CARAVAN and shows up in a few other movies before he started working behind the camera. He was really quite good in this movie, and rather handsome, too.